Chen 2008.
Methods | RCT using simple random allocation to intervention and control groups | |
Participants | 68 childhood cancer patients, receiving phosphocreatine or control treatment of a combination of vitamin C, ATP, vitamin E, and coenzyme Q10. Included participants had anthracycline‐related cardiotoxicity based on cardiac enzymes (CK, CK‐MB, LDH1, alphaHBDH, troponin I, hsCRP), ECG and/or echocardiogram. Median (range) age of the phosphocreatine group was 5 (1 to 15) years; 15 of 35 were males. Age and gender of the control group were not mentioned. Median time since cancer diagnosis was not mentioned. Participants had a diagnosis of acute lymphatic leukaemia or acute myeloid leukaemia. For both groups information on (previous) cardiotoxic cancer treatment (cumulative anthracycline dose, cardiac radiotherapy and dose, and cardioprotective interventions) was not mentioned. Other cardiovascular comorbidities and treatments were also not mentioned. At the start of the study, distribution of abnormalities in cardiac symptoms and signs in the treatment group (n = 35) was: cardiac symptoms 18, abnormal cardiac enzymes 28, abnormal troponin I 7, abnormal ECG 20, and abnormal echocardiogram 0. Mean (SD) hsCRP in the treatment group was 8.79 (1.36) mg/L. For the control group (n = 33) this distribution was: cardiac symptoms 16, abnormal cardiac enzymes 25, abnormal troponin I 7, abnormal ECG 18, and abnormal echocardiogram 0. Mean (SD) hsCRP in the control group was 7.88 (2.08) mg/L. Time since diagnosis of cardiotoxicity was not mentioned |
|
Interventions | Phosphocreatine 1 g intravenously over 30 to 40 minutes once to twice per day (n = 35) or a combination treatment of vitamin C 150 mg/kg and ATP 20 mg into 5% glucose 100 ml intravenously once per day, oral vitamin E 50 mg once per day, and oral coenzyme Q10 (ubidecarenone) 10 mg 3 times per day. All treatment durations were 14 days | |
Outcomes | Overall survival. Mortality due to heart failure (no definitions provided). Occurrence of adverse events (no definition provided). Change in cardiac function (normal/abnormal echocardiography, change in hsCRP, normal/abnormal ECG, normal/abnormal cardiac enzymes (CK, CK‐MB, LDH1, alphaHBDH, troponin I, and hsCRP), postintervention levels of CK, CK‐MB, LDH1, alphaHBDH, and troponin I. No definitions were provided) |
|
Notes | The abstract (in English) mentions "retrospectively assessed". However, we think the study is an RCT, because there is a statement in the methods section (in Chinese) that "all patients have entered the clinical trial with simple random allocation to treatment and control groups." Duration of follow‐up was not mentioned, but it seems that it was 15 days for the assessment of cardiac function, since that was done at the beginning and one day after the intervention. For clinical outcomes this was unclear. There was no loss to follow‐up |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Blinding of participants? | High risk | Blinding of participants was not mentioned but seemed inadequate or very unlikely since the intervention and control treatment had different routes of administration |
Blinding of personnel? | High risk | Blinding of personnel was not mentioned but seemed inadequate or very unlikely since the intervention and control treatment had different routes of administration |
Blinding of outcome assessors? Mortality due to heart failure | Unclear risk | Blinding of outcome assessors was not mentioned |
Blinding of outcome assessors? Occurrence of adverse events and tolerability (as defined by authors) | Unclear risk | Blinding of outcome assessors was not mentioned |
Blinding of outcome assessors? Change in cardiac function measured by a diagnostic test (as defined by authors) | Unclear risk | Blinding of outcome assessors was not mentioned |
Completeness of follow‐up Overall survival | Low risk | Outcome could be abstracted for all participants |
Completeness of follow‐up Mortality due to heart failure | Low risk | Outcome could be abstracted for all participants |
Completeness of follow‐up Occurrence of adverse events and tolerability (as defined by authors) | Low risk | Outcome was provided for all participants |
Completeness of follow‐up Change in cardiac function measured by a diagnostic test (as defined by authors) | Low risk | For echocardiography (normal/abnormal) change in outcome was provided for all participants |
Completeness of follow‐up Change in cardiac function measured by a diagnostic test (as defined by authors) | Low risk | For 1 biomarker (hsCRP) change in outcome was provided for all participants |
Intention‐to‐treat‐analysis? Overall survival | Low risk | Allocation was provided for the reported outcome |
Intention‐to‐treat‐analysis? Mortality due to heart failure | Low risk | Allocation was provided for the reported outcome |
Intention‐to‐treat‐analysis? Occurrence of adverse events and tolerability (as defined by authors) | Low risk | Allocation was provided for the reported outcome |
Intention‐to‐treat‐analysis? Change in cardiac function measured by a diagnostic test (as defined by authors) | Low risk | For echocardiography (normal/abnormal) treatment allocation was provided |
Intention‐to‐treat‐analysis? Change in cardiac function measured by a diagnostic test (as defined by authors) | Low risk | For the biomarker (hsCRP) treatment allocation was provided |
Free of selective reporting? | Unclear risk | We found no published protocol in which the reported outcomes and analyses were prespecified |
Free of other bias? | High risk | The baseline characteristics were not fully described. For example, there was no data about the gender and age distribution of the control group. We do not know what type of anthracycline and what doses of medications were used in each group, and we have no information on whether radiation therapy was given. We are therefore uncertain whether the intervention and control groups were comparable/similar at baseline. We are uncertain whether co‐interventions were different between the intervention and control groups |
Random sequence generation? | Unclear risk | No description of sequence generation |
Allocation concealment? | Unclear risk | No description of allocation concealment |