Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Inherit Metab Dis. 2021 Mar 23;44(4):871–878. doi: 10.1002/jimd.12376

Figure 3: Relationship between RMS score and tremor amplitude of digital Archimedes spirals drawn by cases and controls.

Figure 3:

(Panel A) Individual spiral tremor amplitude scores as a function of RMS score for both cases and controls. The solid line presents a best-fit curve to the combined data, and the shaded area represents the 95% range for all subjects. (Panel B) Individual spiral tremor amplitude scores as a function of RMS score for cases only. The dashed lines represent the 95th % cutoffs for Ln(RMS score) and Ln(tremor amplitude) as defined for controls. (Panel C) Individual spiral tremor amplitude scores as a function of RMS score for controls only. The dashed lines represent the 95th % cutoffs for Ln(RMS score) and Ln(tremor amplitude) as defined for controls.