Table 3.
Participants’ sociodemographic characteristics by cluster (categorical variables; N=94).
| Characteristics | Cluster1a (n=19) n (%) |
Cluster2b (n=50) n (%) |
Cluster3c (n=25) n (%) |
Total (N=94) n (%) |
χ2 (p) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sub-ethnicity | 4.40§ (0.12) | ||||
| Chinese | 15 (78.95) | 29 (58.00) | 10 (40.00) | 54 (57.45) | |
| Korean | 3 (15.79) | 11 (22.00) | 7 (28.00) | 21 (22.34) | |
| Japan | 1 (5.26) | 10 (20.00) | 8 (32.00) | 19 (20.21) | |
| Religion | 4.16 (0.13) | ||||
| Yes | 12 (63.16) | 9 (38.00) | 9 (36.00) | 40 (42.55) | |
| No | 7 (36.84) | 31 (62.00) | 16 (64.00) | 54 (57.45) | |
| Marital status | 0.08 (0.96) | ||||
| Married or partnered | 12 (66.67) | 35 (70.00) | 17 (68.00) | 64 (68.82) | |
| Nonmarried or unpartnered | 6 (33.33) | 15 (30.00) | 8(32.00) | 29 (31.18) | |
| Family income | 7.18 (0.31) | ||||
| Totally insufficient | 5 (27.78) | 10 (20.41) | 2 (8.33) | 17 (18.68) | |
| Somewhat insufficient | 7 (38.89) | 16 (32.65) | 7 (29.17) | 30 (32.97) | |
| Sufficient | 6 (33.33) | 15 (30.61) | 12 (50.00) | 33 (36.26) | |
| More than sufficient | 0 | 8 (16.33) | 3 (12.50) | 11 (12.09) | |
| The area of residence | 5.51 (0.31) | ||||
| Urban | 19 (100.00) | 42 (87.50) | 19 (76.00) | 80 (86.96) | |
| Rural | 0 | 6 (12.50) | 6 (24.00) | 12 (13.04) | |
| The country of birth | 0.91 (0.63) | ||||
| Yes | 3 (15.79) | 4 (8.16) | 3 (12.50) | 10 (10.87) | |
| No | 16 (84.21) | 45 (91.84) | 21 (87.50) | 82 (89.13) |
Note.
a
Cluster 1 = The cluster with high severity scores of total, psychological, physical, and psychosomatic symptoms
b
Cluster 2 = The cluster with moderate severity scores of total, psychological, physical, and psychosomatic symptoms
c
Cluster 3 = The cluster with low severity scores of total, psychological, physical, and psychosomatic symptoms
§
Fisher’s exact test
¶
Tukey’s HSD
*
p < 0.05
**
p < 0.01