Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 15;28(6):4738–4747. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28060399

Table 1.

Patient and clinicopathological characteristics of 100 patients treated with radical prostatectomy at the University Hospital Frankfurt between 01/2018 and 03/2021, with data available for both PAD-test and early continence status. All values are median (IQR) or frequencies (%).

Study Cohort,
(n = 100)
Age in years,
Median (IQR)
65 (58, 69)
PSA in mg/mL,
Median (IQR)
8 (6, 12)
Body Mass Index in kg/m2,
Median (IQR)
26.1 (24.3, 29.9)
International Prostate Symptom Score,
Median (IQR)
6.5 (3, 9)
Body Mass Index grouped in kg/m2,
n (%)
≤25 33 (34%)
25–30 40 (41%)
≥30 25 (26%)
D’Amico risk classification,
n (%)
low 13 (13%)
intermediate 57 (57%)
high 30 (30%)
Surgical approach,
n (%)
robotic-assisted RP 74 (74%)
open RP 26 (26%)
Operation time in min,
Median (IQR)
218 (189, 252)
Prostate volume in cm3,
Median (IQR)
40 (30, 50)
pT-stage,
n (%)
pT2a 6 (6.0%)
pT2b 1 (1.0%)
pT2c 48 (48%)
pT3a 33 (33%)
pT3b 10 (10%)
pT4 2 (2.0%)
Extraprostatic extension of tumor,
n (%)
no 55 (55%)
yes 45 (45%)
pN-stage,
n (%)
pN0 85 (85%)
pN1 4 (4.0%)
pNx 11 (11%)
cM-stage,
n (%)
M0 96 (96%)
M1 4 (4.0%)
Gleason Grade Group RP-specimen,
n (%)
I 9 (9%)
II 53 (54%)
III 19 (19%)
IV 4 (4%)
V 13 (13%)
Nerve sparing,
n (%)
none 7 (7%)
uni/bilateral 93 (93%)
Positive surgical margin,
n (%)
R0 63 (63%)
R1 34 (34%)
Rx 3 (3%)