Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 15;22(Suppl 1):S61–S69. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa180

Table 2.

Urinary biomarkersa at Wave 1 in association with functionally important respiratory symptoms at Wave 2

Urinary biomarkers Nonusers (n = 2849) Exclusive E-cigarette users (n = 222) Poly E-cigarette/tobacco users (n = 1543)
Respiratory symptoms Respiratory symptoms Respiratory symptoms
No (2008) Yes (n = 829) Adjusted p-valueb No (n = 153) Yes (n = 69) Adjusted p-valueb No (n = 756) Yes (n = 781) Adjusted p-valueb
Geo mean (95% CI) Geo mean (95% CI) Geo mean (95% CI) Geo mean (95% CI) Geo mean (95% CI) Geo mean (95% CI)
Urinary nicotine metabolites (ng/mg creatinine)
 TNE2c(nmol/mg creatinine) 0.01 (0.01-0.01) 0.04 (0.03–0.06)1 <.0001 2.3 (1.2–4.6) 5.9 (2.3–14.7)2 0.017 12.5 (9.7–16.2) 31.1 (26.9–36.0)3 <.0001
 Cotinine 0.8 (0.6–0.9) 2.7 (2–3.7)1 <.0001 148.1 (72.9–301.0) 341.3 (135.3–861.0)2 0.0245 817.6 (626.1–1067.5) 2031.4 (1769.0–2332.6)3 <.0001
TSNAs (pg/mg creatinine)
 NNAL 1.4 (1.2–1.6) 3.1 (2.4–3.9)1 <.0001 4.4 (3.5–5.6) 10.7 (6.5–17.5)2 0.0043 98.9 (79.7–122.7) 199.6 (176.7–225.4)3 0.0001
N′-Nitrosonornicotine 2.2 (2.0–2.3) 2.8 (2.5–3)1 0.0053 3.3 (2.8–3.8) 3.6 (2.7–4.8)1 0.8939 8.0 (6.9–9.4) 10.2 (9.4–11.2)2 0.4374
Heavy metals (ng/mg creatinine)
 Cadmium (UCD) 0.2 (0.1–0.2) 0.2 (0.2-0.2)1 0.2931 0.2 (0.1–0.2) 0.3 (0.2–0.4)2 0.0110 0.2 (0.1–0.2) 0.2 (0.2–0.3)2 0.8579
 Lead (UPB) 0.4 (0.3–0.4) 0.4 (0.3–0.4)1 0.5484 0.4 (0.3–0.4) 0.5 (0.4–0.7)2 0.0885 0.4 (0.4-0.4) 0.5 (0.4–0.5)2 0.5526
PAHs (ng/mg creatinine)
 1-Naphthol or 1-hydroxynaphthalene (1-NAP) 1.5 (1.4–1.7) 2.2 (1.8–2.5)1 0.0359 1.4 (1–1.9) 2.5 (1.7–3.6)1 0.1526 6.9 (5.9–8) 11.4 (9.9–13)2 0.0028
 3-Hydroxyfluorene (3-FLU) 0.07 (0.07–0.08) 0.1 (0.09–0.11)1 0.0058 0.06 (0.05–0.07) 0.1 (0.08–0.13)1 0.0066 0.37 (0.33–0.41) 0.55 (0.5–0.6)2 0.0002
VOCs (ng/mg creatinine)
  CEMA) (Acrolein) 99 (94.4–103.8) 114.3 (103.9–125.9)1 0.0268 98.9 (90–108.8) 123.6(102.3–149.2)1 0.0733 197.1 (180.4–215.4) 280 (261.7–299.5)2 <.0001
 CYMA (acrylonitrile) 1.6 (1.5–1.8) 3.5 (3–4.1)1 <.0001 3.4 (2.6–4.4) 7.3 (4.6–11.6)2 0.0087 58.1 (47.7–70.7) 122.5 (107.7–139.3)3 <.0001

Geo Mean: geometric mean of concentration.

aAll analyses applied urinary sample weight, 100 replicated weights, and the balanced repeated replication method with Fay’s adjustment = 0.3 to account for the PATH Study’s complex design.

bSeparate analyses were performed for three exclusive e-cigarette user groups (no use of e-cigarette and tobacco product, exclusive e-cigarette use, and use of e-cigarettes and 1+ type of tobacco product) based on the self-report. Multivariable general linear regressions were conducted to examine the relationship between biomarker concentration levels at Wave 1 (outcome variable, log-transformed, and creatinine corrected) and respiratory symptoms at Wave 2, adjusted by baseline sociodemographics (sex, age, race/ethnicity, and education), self-reported exposure to SHS, past 12-month use of marijuana, and lung or respiratory disease. Bold indicates significance at .005 with adjustment for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method.

cTNE2: The molar sum of the imputed values of cotinine, and trans-3′-hydroxycotinine, urine.

1,2,3Multivariable general linear regressions were conducted to compare biomarker concentration levels (dependent variables) by e-cigarette use status among subjects with respiratory symptoms. E-cigarette user groups that were significantly different in pairwise contrasts are denoted by nonshared superscript numbers. The analysis was adjusted by baseline sociodemographics (sex, age, race/ethnicity, and education), self-reported exposure to SHS, past 12-month use of marijuana, and lung or respiratory disease.