Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 29.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2021 Aug 19;243:118487. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118487

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9.

Examining the association between age and functional connectivity as a function of parcellation (Sample 2). A: Results of a model comparison evaluating whether the addition of an interaction for age by parcellation results in a better fit than a model with no interaction term for each of the networks of interest. The association between age and network connectivity varies significantly as a function of parcellation for the salience, control, and default networks, but not for the dorsal attention network. For networks with a significant interaction of age and parcellation, we provide beta estimates and p-values for the simple slopes of the association between age and functional connectivity for each of parcellation. Greater details on these associations are provided for the default network in panels B,C. B: Figure depicts substantial variability in the point estimates and confidence intervals for the association of age with default connectivity for each of the parcellations. Significant results would have been obtained if an independent researcher had selected either the Glasser, NeuroSynth or Yeo, but not one of the other five parcellations. C: Plots of the association between age and default connectivity for each of the eight parcellations.