Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 29;2021(11):CD013531. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013531.pub2

Comparison 1. Low FODMAP diet versus sham diet.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1.1 Pain frequency defined by days of pain by IBS‐SSS scores (0 to 100) for IBD 1 52 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐2.00 [‐15.86, 11.86]
1.2 Days with moderate or severe pain by GSRS scores for IBD (0 to 3) for IBD 1 52 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.40 [‐0.44, 1.24]
1.3 Pain frequency defined by days of pain by IBS‐SSS scores (0 to 100) for CD 1 26 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐12.00 [‐114.55, 90.55]
1.4 Pain intensity IBD (0 to 100) 2 82 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐8.46 [‐15.76, ‐1.16]
1.5 Pain intensity IBD (0 to 3) 1 52 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.20 [‐8.67, 9.07]
1.6 Pain intensity CD (0 to 100) 1 26 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐8.00 [‐66.27, 50.27]
1.7 Withdrawals due to adverse events 1 52 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.85 [0.18, 19.19]