Skip to main content
. 2000 Oct;20(20):7460–7462. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.20.7460-7462.2000

TABLE 1.

Analysis of in vivo cardiac size and function by echocardiography in FHL2-deficient mice at basal level and 7 days following TAC

Mouse group Avg ± SDa
Body wt (mg) Heart rate (beats/min) IVS (mm) PW (mm) LVEDD (mm) LVESD (mm) FS% Vcf (circumferences/s) PG (mm of Hg) Heart wt/ body wt
Wild type
 Basal (n = 9) 36.5 ± 5.4 488 ± 40 0.70 ± 0.08 0.73 ± 0.08 3.63 ± 0.53 2.12 ± 0.56 42.4 ± 8.9 7.69 ± 1.83
 After TAC (n = 9) 34.5 ± 4.32 425 ± 38 0.94 ± 0.11b 1.00 ± 0.15b 3.10 ± 0.32c 1.51 ± 0.31c 51.5 ± 8.2c 9.18 ± 1.25 67 ± 28 0.41 ± 0.07
Homozygous
 Basal (n = 6) 34.5 ± 6.5 414 ± 63 0.71 ± 0.04 0.70 ± 0.11 3.91 ± 0.45 2.45 ± 0.46 37.6 ± 6.2 7.16 ± 1.01
 After TAC (n = 6) 34.2 ± 7.08 427 ± 46 0.90 ± 0.24d 0.88 ± 0.25d 3.04 ± 0.43d 1.66 ± 0.5d 46.0 ± 12.2d 8.05 ± 2.74 85 ± 47 0.38 ± 0.06
a

IVS, interventricular wall thickness; PW, left ventricular posterior wall thickness; LVEDD, end-diastolic left ventricular dimension; LVESD, end-systolic left ventricular dimension; FS%, left ventricular percent fractional shortening; Vcf, velocity of circumferential fiber shortening; PG, pressure gradient across the aortic constriction. 

b

P < 0.001, wild type after TAC versus basal. 

c

P < 0.05, wild type after TAC versus basal. 

d

P < 0.05, homozygous after TAC versus basal.