Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2021 Sep 14;131:102127. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2021.102127

Figure 2: Blood transcriptomic signature of treatment in the ATB cohort is associated with NK cells, monocytes and IFN signaling.

Figure 2:

A) Heatmap representing the log fold change expression upon treatment of the upregulated (red) and downregulated (green) gene-mapped probes in the ATBΔ signature derived from differential expression analysis (adjusted p value < 0.1) between post-and pre-treatment paired blood samples in the ATB cohort (n=8) (Table S3). Asterisks show microbiologically confirmed cases. B) Individual z-scores pre and post treatment for the upregulated and downregulated genes in the ATBΔ signature in B) all ATB participants (n=8) and C) microbiologically confirmed (n=3) vs suspected (n=5) ATB participants. D) Immune cell type-specific expression and E) top-10 biological pathways enriched in the upregulated genes of the ATBΔ signature. F) Immune cell type-specific expression and G) top-10 biological pathways enriched in the downregulated genes of the ATBΔ signature. (D,F) For immune cell type-specific expression, each bar consists of stacked sub-bars showing the TPM normalized expression of every gene in corresponding cell type, extracted from the DICE database 34 (http://dice-database.org/). (E,G) Biological pathways were ranked with increasing adjusted p value and dotted line represents significance threshold (adjusted p value < 0.05). H) Overlap between our newly identified ATBΔ treatment signature (Burel238) and previously reported signatures associated with anti-TB therapy 23, 24, 26.