Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 29;94(1128):20210907. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210907

Table 8.

Questions posed to the breast radiologists for each case

Independent
reviewer 1
Independent
reviewer 2
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6
Ductal 002 5 Ductal 002 5
010 Training case 010 Training case
027 4 027 4
029 5 029 5
013 * * * * * * 013 * * * * * *
041 * * * * * * 041 * * * * * *
Lobular 039 5 Lobular 039 5
004 5 004 5
008 5 008 5
032 Training case 032 Training case
043 1 043 1
Simple cyst 030 2 Simple cyst 030 2
009 2 009 2
040 Training case 040 Training case
012 2 012 3
006 3 006 2
019 2 019 2
036 2 036 2
003 2 003 2
Fibroadenoma 017 3 Fibroadenoma 017 3
031 Training case 031 Training case
037 4 037 4
023 * * * * * * 023 * * * * * *
Complicated cyst 033 3 Complicated cyst 033 3

MBI, Microwave Breast Imaging.

(Q1) Is there an obvious abnormality on mammography/ultrasound? (2) What is the BIRADS score? (3) Does MBI clearly identify the abnormality? (4) Is the MBI lesion size estimate accurate? (5) Is the MBI lesion classification score accurate? (6) Is the addition of Wavelia MBI useful in this case? (Asterisks indicate patients that were not included in the review, as no MBI results were reportable)