Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 11;12:761209. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.761209

Table 2.

The performance of various indicators for discriminating ATB from LTBI in Qiaokou cohort.

Variables Cutoff value AUC (95% CI) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI) PLR (95% CI) NLR (95% CI) Accuracy
HLA-DR on IFN-γ+TNF-α+ cells (%) 49 0.886 (0.826-0.946) 90.00% (78.64%-95.65%) 61.82% (48.61%-73.48%) 68.18% (56.21%-78.15%) 87.18% (73.3%-94.4%) 2.36 (1.66-3.34) 0.16 (0.07-0.38) 75.24%
TBAg/PHA ratio 0.3 0.736 (0.645-0.827) 40.74% (28.68%-54.03%) 91.94% (82.47%-96.51%) 81.48% (63.30%-91.82%) 64.04% (53.69%-73.24%) 5.05 (2.05-12.42) 0.64 (0.51-0.81) 68.10%
Diagnostic model 0.36 0.937 (0.892-0.982) 92.00% (81.16%-96.85%) 81.82% (69.67%-89.81%) 82.14% (70.16%-90.00%) 91.84% (80.81%-96.78%) 5.06 (2.87-8.92) 0.1 (0.04-0.25) 86.67%

ATB, active tuberculosis; LTBI, latent tuberculosis infection; TBAg, tuberculosis-specific antigen; PHA, phytohaemagglutinin; AUC, area under the curve; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio; CI, confidence interval.