Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 1;304(1):255–275. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.11.052

Table 3.

Optimality gap results using lb, ub, and lb+ub for R and S under different budget levels.

Budget Exp CutTime
Time
MIPgap
GapImp1
Igap Rgap GapImp2
(CPU sec)
(CPU sec)
(%)
(%)
(%) (%) (%)
R S R S R S R S R R
$30M cpx 0 7203 13.1 13.9
lb 797 1330 8098 8536 13.1 13.3 0.1 0.0 13.2 4.9
ub 848 1306 8068 8524 8.1 7.9 38.3 39.4 13.9 0.0
lb+ub 965 1331 8294 8535 8.0 9.3 38.6 29.0 13.2 4.9

$35M cpx 0 7203 9.3 10.3
lb 171 1234 7476 8438 9.3 13.4 0.0 0.0 9.4 9.0
ub 157 1314 7393 8530 8.3 7.8 10.4 15.8 10.3 0.0
lb+ub 178 1270 7501 8481 8.3 10.1 11.0 0.0 9.4 9.0

$40M cpx 0 7204 9.6 10.7
lb 434 1080 7736 8282 9.5 13.3 0.4 0.0 9.5 10.7
ub 434 1098 7654 8302 8.3 7.8 13.4 19.1 10.7 0.0
lb+ub 434 1088 7754 8291 8.3 9.2 13.1 4.0 9.5 10.7

$45M cpx 0 7203 9.3 10.4
lb 1381 1354 8682 8358 9.3 13.4 0.1 0.0 9.2 12.1
ub 1252 1132 8458 8334 8.1 8.0 13.0 14.4 10.4 0.0
lb+ub 1335 1121 8639 8324 8.2 7.7 12.2 17.8 9.2 12.1

$50M cpx 1 6775 0.0 1.1
lb 204 982 7086 8188 0.0 13.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
ub 215 969 7424 8172 0.0 7.4 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0
lb+ub 220 956 7524 8168 0.0 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0

Average cpx 0 7118 8.3 9.3
lb 598 1156 7816 8360 8.2 13.4 0.1 0.0 8.3 27.3
ub 581 1164 7799 8372 6.6 7.8 15.0 17.7 9.3 0.0
lb+ub 626 1153 7942 8360 6.6 8.7 15.0 10.2 8.3 27.3