Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 28;64(7):2734–2749. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00217

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics and group comparisons for subgrouping and descriptive assessments.

Group scores
ANOVA results
Subgrouping assessment TD (n = 90) DLD (n = 53) DYS (n = 32) DLD + DYS (n = 69) df (3, F p R 2 Group comparison
CELF-4
M (SD)
100.96 (6.84) 79.49 (5.27) 97.31 (5.53) 73.84 (8.76) 240 241.47 < .001 .751 TD > DYS > DLD > DLD + DYS
WRMT-3
M (SD)
101.24 (6.17) 101.13 (7.47) 80.22 (3.62) 74.70 (7.37) 240 284.52 < .001 .781 TD = DLD > DYS > DLD + DYS

Descriptive assessment

TD a

DLD b

DYS

DLD + DYS c

df (3,

F

p

R 2

Group comparison
TOWRE-2
M (SD)
102.11 (9.79) 101.13 (9.47) 79.12 (8.02) 75.35 (12.17) 239 119.80 < .001 .601 TD = DLD > DYS = DLD + DYS
CTOPP-2
M (SD)
92.89 (11.63) 83.70 (10.68) 88.09 (12.19) 75.96 (9.58) 239 31.88 < .001 .286 TD = DYS, DYS = DLD, TD > DLD > DLD + DYS, DYS > DLD + DYS
PPVT-4
M (SD)
107.11 (10.91) 93.72 (7.97) 104.84 (8.69) 91.41 (9.40) 238 44.27 < .001 .358 TD = DYS > DLD = DLD + DYS
EVT-2
M (SD)
105.90 (8.63) 93.45 (7.08) 101.37 (6.29) 87.32 (8.31) 239 78.82 < .001 .494 TD > DYS > DLD > DLD + DYS
TONI-4
M (SD)
106.73 (8.68) 101.44 (9.40) 100.91 (9.31) 95.24 (8.32) 234 21.56 < .001 .217 TD > DLD = DYS > DLD + DYS

Note. A series of one-way ANOVAs were estimated to examine group differences on the subgrouping and descriptive assessments. Pairwise comparisons using Tukey's honestly significant difference test were applied to maintain an experiment-wise Type I error rate of .05 for each model. ANOVA = analysis of variance; TD = typical development; DLD = developmental language disorder; DYS = dyslexia; CELF-4 = Comprehensive Evaluation of Language Fundamentals–Fourth Edition; WRMT-3 = Woodcock Reading Mastery Test–Third Edition; TOWRE-2 = Test of Word Reading Efficiency–Second Edition; CTOPP-2 = Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing–Second Edition; PPVT-4 = Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Fourth Edition; EVT-2 = Expressive Vocabulary Test–Second Edition; TONI-4 = Test of Nonverbal Intelligence–Fourth Edition.

a

Sample sizes differed on the PPVT-4 (n = 89) and TONI-4 (n = 86).

b

Sample sizes differed on the TOWRE-2 and TONI-4 (n = 52).

c

Sample sizes differed on the CTOPP-2, PPVT-4, EVT-2, and TONI-4 (n = 68).