Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 1;2021(12):CD010995. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010995.pub3

DAWN.

Study characteristics
Methods International, multicentre, prospective, randomised, open‐label trial with blinded assessment of endpoints
Participants Patients were eligible for inclusion if they had evidence of occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery, the first segment of the middle cerebral artery, or both on CTA or MRA. They also needed to have a clinical/radiological mismatch between the severity of the clinical deficit and the infarct volume.
Patients must have clinical signs and symptoms consistent with the diagnosis of an acute ischaemic stroke, and belong to 1 of the following subgroups: patient has failed IV t‐PA therapy (defined as a confirmed persistent occlusion 60 min after administration); patient is contraindicated for IV t‐PA administration.
Age ≥ 18 years
Baseline NIHSS ≥ 10 (assessed within 1 hour prior to measuring core infarct volume)
Patient can be randomised between 6 and 24 hours after time last known well.
No significant pre‐stroke disability (pre‐stroke mRS must be 0 or 1)
Infarction < 1/3 MCA territory involved, as evidenced by CT or MRI
Interventions Thrombectomy (treatment group) versus standard medical care (control group)
Outcomes Primary endpoint was mean score of mRS at 90 days.
Notes Funding source: Stryker Neurovascular. Terminated prematurely due to efficacy
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation was central and a web‐based procedure with block minimisation to balance the 2 treatment groups, and was stratified according to mismatch criteria, the interval between the time that the participant was last known to be well and randomisation.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Web‐based randomisation
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Open‐label trial
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Blinded assessment of endpoints
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk No participants lost to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No participants lost to follow‐up, and intention‐to‐treat analysis provided
Other bias Low risk At 31 months and 206 participants enrolled, the trial was stopped because of the results of a prespecified interim analysis. Adaptive trial design with sample size from 150 to 500 participants