Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 30;6:101. doi: 10.1038/s41525-021-00264-y

Table 1.

Overlap of integration breakpoints with FANCD2-assocated fragile sites.

Dataset Integration subgroups Breakpoints or loci per subgroup (n) Overlap with FANCD2 sites (n) % p-Value
CESC All breakpoints 1299 229 17.6 0.0001
Single breakpoints 258 39 15.1 0.0044
Clustered breakpoints 1041 190 18.3 0.0001
Condensed clustered breakpoints 326 59 18.1 0.0001
Combined single and condensed breakpoints 584 98 16.8 0.0001
HNSCCa All breakpoints 118 21 17.8 0.0039
Single breakpoints 27 2 7.4 0.5011
Clustered breakpoints 91 19 20.9 0.0009
Condensed clustered breakpoints 30 5 16.7 0.2293
Combined single and condensed breakpoints 57 7 12.3 0.3700

CESC and HNSCC integration breakpoints (±50 Kb flank regions) were grouped by the number of breakpoints per integration locus; single indicates one breakpoint and clustered indicates two or more breakpoints. Integration breakpoints from each subgroup were intersected with FANCD2-enriched regions and the frequency of overlap calculated. For the “All breakpoints,” “Single breakpoints (not clustered),” and "Clustered breakpoints" each breakpoint was tested independently for its overlap with FANCD2-enriched regions, regardless of whether it was part of a cluster or not. For the “Condensed clustered breakpoints” subgroup, the region spanning the most 5′- and 3′-breakpoints of an integration locus was used to test for the overlap with FANCD2-enriched regions. For the “Combined single and condensed breakpoints” subgroup, the “Single breakpoints (not clustered),” and “Condensed clustered breakpoints” subgroups were combined for overlap analysis. The data was permutated 10,000 times to create an expected distribution of overlap. Bold font indicates significant p-values.

aA single integration breakpoint on chromosome Y was excluded from this analysis.