. 2021 Nov 13;3(4):fcab259. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab259

Table 1.

Ridge regression behavioural prediction comparison from PC-FDC, FDC and structural lesion maps

	Patients	C (95%)	R ²	C (95%)	R ²	C (95%)	R ²	C (95%)	R ²
	Patients	FDC		PC-FDC		PC-Lesion		PC-Lesion + PC-FDC
Language	110	6	0.03	7	0.05^*	62	0.43^*	69	0.54^*
Attention VF	93	7	0.09^*	8	0.08^*	53	0.11^*	61	0.12^*
Memory Verbal	85	6	0.03	7	0.03	46	0.03^*	53	0.09^*
Memory Spatial	85	6	0.06^*	7	0.09^*	46	0.10^*	53	0.11^*
Motor L-R	48	5	0.16^*	6	0.20^*	26	0.25^*	32	0.24^*
Motor R-L	54	6	0.10^*	6	0.08^*	30	0.31^*	36	0.29^*
Visual L-R	23	4	0.14^*	5	0.18^*	23	0.42^*	17	0.40^*
Visual R-L	29	6	0.39^*	7	0.55^*	29	0.59^*	24	overfit

C = number of components; L = left; R = right; VF = visual fields.

Model significant.