Table 1.

Comparisons of genome assemblies and annotations among species in the Ericales

Species	Assembled genome size (Mb)	Contig N50 (kb)	Scaffold N50 (kb)	Complete BUSCOs of assembly (%)	Annotated gene numbers	Complete BUSCOs of annotation (%)	Repetitive sequences ratio (%)	Reference
Rhododendron ovatum	549	1241	41 000	95.30	41 264	96.10	44.70	This study
Rhododendron simsii	529	2235	36 351	93.68	32 999	89.91	47.48	Yang et al. (2020)
Rhododendron delavayi	695	62	638	92.80	32 938	87.40	51.77	Zhang et al. (2017a)
Rhododendron williamsianum	532	219	29 011	89.00	23 559	77.20	58.80	Soza et al. (2019)
Vaccinium corymbosum	1680	15	186	95.50	32 140	97.21	44.31	Colle et al. (2019)
Actinidia chinensis	654	1430	20 000	90.80	38 202	86.33	43.42	Wu et al. (2019)
Primula vulgaris	411	1	295	89.92	24 000	86.23	37.03	Cocker et al. (2018)
Diospyros lotus	746	1060	29 749	78.97	40 532	74.07	66.60	Akagi et al. (2020)
Camellia sinensis	2940	600	167 113	90.60	50 525	90.24	86.87	Xia et al. (2020)