Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 27;3(Suppl 5):v86–v95. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab108

Table 1.

Comparison of Cerebrospinal Analysis Techniques for Detection and Characterization of Leptomeningeal Disease

Conventional Cytology CTC Analysis ctDNA Analysis
Method Direct visualization and identification of neoplastic cells Detection of tumor cells in CSF based on surface molecule expression Analysis of DNA released from tumor cells within CSF
Sensitivity 44–67% from first lumbar puncture, increased with serial testing 76–100% reported sensitivity for EpCAM-based detection Not applicable
Availability Wide-spread, available for all tumor types Limited, requires use of specialized equipment and personnel. Limited
Diagnostic Interpretation Qualitative, can be inconclusive requiring serial lumbar punctures to establish diagnosis Quantitative, but dependent on surface molecule expression Not applicable
Biomarker potential Not applicable Potential use for monitoring treatment response and prognostication Potential use for detecting resistance mutations or progression
Molecular genetics Provides no information on tumor genetics May be combined with downstream genetic testing to identify mutations and CSF clonal divergence Can identify driver mutations and CSF clonal divergence

CTCs, circulating tumor cells; ctDNA, cell-free tumor DNA; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; LM, leptomeningeal metastasis.