Table 4.
Correlates of cessation and quit attempts.
| Variables | Cessation [OR (95% CI)]an = 797 | Quit attempts [IRR (95% CI)]bn = 328 |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | Ref | Ref |
| Female | 1.3 (0.5–3.1) | 1.9 (0.5–6.7) |
| City | ||
| Chennai | Ref | Ref |
| Delhi | 0.6 (0.3–1.1) | 0.6 (0.3–1.1) |
| Age group | ||
| 25–44 years | NA | Ref |
| 45–64 years | NA | 0.9 (0.6–1.5) |
| ≥65 years | NA | 0.7 (0.2–2.1) |
| Employment status | ||
| Employed | Ref | Ref |
| Student | 1.0 (0.4–2.4) | 1.1 (0.3–3.5) |
| Housewife | 1.9 (0.6–6.1) | 0.9 (0.2–5.4) |
| Retired | 1.5 (0.3–7.0) | 0.2 (0.0–1.0) |
| Unemployed | 0.8 (0.1–3.9) | 0.3 (0.1–2.0) |
| Cigarette smokers | ||
| Non-users | NA | Ref |
| Current daily cigarette smokers | NA | 0.7 (0.3–1.8) |
| Current occasional smokers | NA | 0.7 (0.3–1.6) |
| Bidi smokers | ||
| Non-users | NA | Ref |
| Current daily bidi smokers | NA | 0.2 (0.1–0.6) |
| Current occasional bidi smokers | NA | 0.7 (0.2–2.2) |
| SLT users | ||
| Non-users | NA | Ref |
| Current daily SLT users | NA | 0.7 (0.2–1.7) |
| Current occasional SLT users | NA | 1.4 (0.4–4.5) |
| Knowledge on the harmful effects of tobacco use and COVID-19 | ||
| Poor | Ref | Ref |
| Average | 0.5 (0.3–1.0) | 1.9 (1.0–3.4) |
| Good | 2.2 (1.2–4.0) | 5.7 (2.8–11.8) |
| Knowledge on legislative decisions | ||
| Poor | Ref | Ref |
| Average | 0.5 (0.3–0.9) | 1.5 (0.8–2.9) |
| Good | 0.4 (0.2–0.9) | 1.6 (0.7–3.6) |
| Overall access | ||
| No | Ref | NA |
| Yes | 0.3 (0.2–0.5) | NA |
CI, confidence interval; IRR, incidence risk ratio; OR, odds ratio; Ref, reference; SLT, smokeless tobacco.
Bold values indicate significant association.
Estimates derived using logistic regression. Variables with P values <0.15 in univariate analysis were included in the regression models.
Estimates derived using negative binomial regression model. Variables with P values <0.15 in univariate analysis were included in the regression models.