Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 6;12(6):2190–2215. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab077

TABLE 1.

Combined diet, exercise, and gut microbiota interventions in athletes1

Study (reference) Year Diet/supplement Exercise/test Duration Participants Microbiota effects Metabolite effects Metabolic effects Performance effects
Moreno-Pérez et al. (37) 2018 Protein supplement (10 g whey isolate + 10 g beef hydrosylate) vs. control (maltodextrin) Habitual training (≥5× per week) 10 wk 24 males, ages 18–45 y, cross-country runners ↑ Bacteroidetes in protein group; ↓ Roseburia, Blautia, Bif. longum in protein group ↔ Fecal pH, water content, ammonia, SCFA concentration, plasma or urine malondialdehyde in protein group  —  —
Murtaza et al. (38) 2019 HCHO vs. PCHO vs. LCHF Habitual training test: VO2peak, walking economy, 10-km race time, 25-km long walk time, respiratory exchange ratio, fuel oxidation rate 3 wk 21 males, ages 20–35 y, race walkers ↔ Enterotype, diversity (Shannon, Simpson, weighted/unweighted UniFrac) in diet groups; ↓ Faecalibacterium spp., Bifidobacterium, Veillonella, Streptococcus, Succinivibrio, Odoribacter, Lachnospira spp. in LCHF group; ↑ Dorea spp., Bacteroides spp., Enterobacteriaceae, Peptostreptococcaceae, Barnesiellaceae, Akkermansia in LCHF group; LCHF × enterotype interaction (↓ Bif., ↑ Sutterella in Bacteroides enterotype; ↑ Clostridiales in Prevotella enterotype); ↑ Clostridiales, Ruminococcaceae, Coprococcus spp., Akkermansia muciniphila, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus in PCHO group; ↑ Clostridiaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, Streptophyta in HCHO group  — ↑ Fat oxidation in LCHF group Bacteroides ∼ fat oxidation (–) in LCHF group ↓ Exercise economy, 10-km race performance in LCHF group; ↑ exercise economy, 10-km race performance in HCHO and PCHO groups; Dorea ∼ exercise economy () in LCHF group
Karl et al. (39) 2017 Rations (control) vs. rations + protein supplement (whey) vs. rations + carbohydrate supplement 4-d cross-country ski-march (STRESS) 4 d 73 soldiers, age >18 y, 71 men, 2 women ↑ α-Diversity (Shannon) post STRESS (no difference between groups); ↔ richness (Chao1, total observed OTUs); ↑ Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio post STRESS (no difference between groups) ↑ p-Cresol post STRESS (no difference between groups) ↑ Sucralose and mannitol excretion post STRESS (no difference between groups); ↔ LPS  —
Son et al. (40) 2020 Probiotic supplement (1012 CFU each Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. casei, L. helveticus, Bifidobacterium bifidum) vs. placebo; divided into groups based on dietary intake: group 1 (high-protein, reduced fiber), group 2 (high-protein, adequate fiber), group 3 (adequate protein, restricted fiber), group 4 (sedentary control) Habitual training 60 d 15 males, bodybuilders ↔ α-Diversity (Shannon, Simpson), probiotic bacteria (Lactobacilli, Bifidobacterium) in probiotic vs. placebo group; ↑ Paraprevotella in probiotic group; ↑ Megamonas, Anaerostipes, Dorea in placebo group; ↔ α-diversity in group 1 vs. group 4; ↑ no. of species, Chao1 richness, ACE, Jacknife in groups 2 and 3 vs. group 4; ↑ Haemophilus, Streptococcus in group 1; ↑ Bifidobacterium in group 2; ↑ Faecalibacterium in group 3 ↔ SCFAs  —  —
Huang et al. (41) 2020 Probiotic supplement (3× 1010 CFU/d L. plantarum 128) vs. placebo Habitual training test: Inline graphic, endurance performance 4 wk 20 males, triathletes Akkermansia, Bifidobacterium, Butyricimonas, Lactobacilli in Probiotic group; ↓ α-diversity (Shannon), Anaerotruncus, Caproiciproducens, Coprobacillus, Desulfovibrio, Dielma, Family_XIII, Holdemania, Oxalobacter in Probiotic group; ↔ Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio ↑ SCFAs (acetate, propionate, butyrate) in probiotic group ↔ Body composition (bone, fat, lean %), blood biochemistry (glucose, lipids, creatinine, liver enzymes, blood cell counts) Inline graphic; ↑ endurance performance
Martarelli et al. (42) 2011 Probiotic supplement (109 CFU/d, 1:1 of L. rhamnosus IMC 501, L. paracasei IMC 502) vs. control (no supplement); all athletes on controlled diet developed based on athlete's basal metabolism, body composition, and energy expenditure (methods not described) Controlled training developed based on athlete's basal metabolism, body composition and energy expenditure (methods not described) 4 wk 24 males, cyclists Lactobacilli in Probiotic group  — ↑ Reactive oxygen metabolites after physical activity in control group (not in probiotic group); ↑ plasma antioxidants in probiotic group  —
West et al. (43) 2011 Probiotic supplement (109 CFU/d L. fermentum PCC) vs. placebo Habitual training test: Inline graphic, peak power output, postexercise cytokine response 11 wk 64 males, 35 females, cyclists Lactobacilli in males in probiotic group (not in females)—obtained from subset of 10 males and 10 females from each group  — ↓ Severity of GI and lower respiratory illness in males in probiotic vs. placebo; ↑ number and duration (↓ severity) of lower respiratory illness in females in probiotic vs. placebo; ↓ cytokine response to acute exercise in probiotic group; ↔ upper respiratory tract infection, mucosal immunity (lactoferrin, lysozyme, SIgA) Inline graphic
Axelrod et al. (44) 2020 Probiotic supplement (2× 108 CFU/d L. salivarius UCC118) vs. placebo Test 2-h treadmill at 60% Inline graphic 4 wk 7 trained endurance athletes, ages 18–45 y ↓ Verrumicrobia, Verrumicrobiae, Verrumicrobiales, Verrumicrobiaceae, Prosthecobacter fusiformis in Probiotic group; ↔ diversity/richness (Chao1, ACE, Shannon, Simpson)  — ↓ GI permeability of sucrose in probiotic group; ↔ lactulose and rhamnose excretion, fecal zonulin, core temperature, IL-6  —
1

ACE, Abundance-based Coverage Estimator;Bif., Bifidobacterium; GI, gastrointestinal; HCHO, high carbohydrate; LCHF, ketogenic low-carbohydrate, high-fat; OTU, operational taxonomic unit; PCHO, periodized carbohydrate; SIgA, secretory immunoglobulin A; STRESS, 4-d cross-country ski march, Inline graphic, maximal oxygen uptake; VO2peak, peak oxygen uptake; ↑, significant increase; ↓, significant decrease; ↔, no significant difference.