Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 16;8:754859. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.754859

Table 5.

External validation with our hospital data.

Research variables 28-day mortality 90-day mortality
HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value
Model 1
FFP transfusion vs. non-FFP transfusion 3.572 1.956–6.524 <0.001 2.758 1.690–4.500 <0.001
Model 2
FFP transfusion vs. non-FFP transfusion 2.470 1.272–4.795 0.008 1.979 1.142–3.429 0.015
Model 3
FFP transfusion vs. non-FFP transfusion 2.493 1.273–4.884 0.008 2.386 1.363–4.175 0.002
Sensitivity analysis with different coagulation indexes
Non-hypocoagulable group (INR ≤ 1.20)* 1.313 0.175–9.856 0.791 0.793 0.172–3.658 0.767
Hypocoagulable group (INR > 1.20)* 1.931 0.905–4.119 0.089 1.608 0.853–3.030 0.142
Non-hypocoagulable group (PTT ≤ 40)* 2.775 0.617–12.472 0.183 2.748 0.805–9.379 0.107
Hypocoagulable group (PTT > 40)* 2.426 1.133–5.193 0.023 1.814 0.974–3.379 0.061
Subgroup analysis in FFP transfusion group (N = 174)
Low transfusion volume vs. high transfusion volume*# 1.884 1.040–3.4146 0.037 1.882 1.096–3.232 0.022

The significant P-value was indicated in bold.

*

Adjusting for the covariates of Model 2.

#

Median as cutoff value. CI, confidence interval; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; HR, hazard ratio; INR, international normalized ratio; and PTT, partial thromboplastin time.