Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 25;2(1):100067. doi: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100067

Table 6.

Summary of the Secondary Efficacy Outcomes

Parameter FAS (n = 31) PP (n = 27) Details
Absolute wound size reduction, (cm2)1
 Change from baseline at week 12 2.4 (14.0)2 5.2 (6.6) Table 7
Complete wound closure
 Subjects with complete closure at week 12, n (%) 6 (20)2 6 (22) Table 9
 Subjects with complete closure at any time up to week 12, n (%) 7 (23) 7 (26) Table 9
 Time to complete closure, days3 Not reached Not reached Figure 3a
≥30% wound size reduction
 Subjects with ≥30% reduction at week 12 (responders), n (%) 21 (70)2 21 (78) Table 9
 Subjects with ≥30% reduction at any time up to week 12, n (%) 26 (84) 24 (89) Table 9
 Time to ≥30% reduction, days3 21 (12; 27) 15 (9; 27) Figure 3b
Reopening after complete wound closure
 Subjects with wounds reopened at week 12, n (%) 1 (3.2) 1 (3.7) n.a.
Granulation, % of wound area
 Day 0 not evaluable not evaluable n.a.
 Week 12 not evaluable not evaluable n.a.
Epithelialization, % of wound area
 Day 0 not evaluable not evaluable n.a.
 Week 12 not evaluable not evaluable n.a.
Exudation
 Wounds with low exudation, n (%)
 Day 0 14 (45) 11 (41) Table 10
 Week 12 18 (62)4 16 (62)5 Table 10
 Wounds with moderate exudation, n (%)
 Day 0 15 (48) 14 (52) Table 10
 Week 12 10 (34)4 10 (38)5 Table 10
Pain score1
 Day 0 3.6 (3.2) n.a. Table 11
 Week 12 2.5 (2.2)2 n.a. Table 11
QOL6
 Dermatology Life Quality Index7
 Day 0 9.5 (4–16)2 n.a. Table 12
 Week 12 6.0 (3–12)2 n.a. Table 12

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; FAS, full analysis set; IQR, interquartile range; n.a., not applicable; PP, per-protocol set.

Detailed results are given in Tables 7 and Table 9, Table 10, Table 11, Table 12.

1

Mean (SD).

2

n = 30.

3

Median (95% CI).

4

n = 29.

5

n = 26.

6

Owing to space limitations, the Short Form (36) Health Survey subscale scores (which remained virtually unchanged during the efficacy follow-up) are not shown in this table but are given in Table 12.

7

Median (IQR).