Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 18;10(1):2128–2140. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1999177

Table 1.

Isolation data, lineage and identification of the new isolates in comparison with those of the control strains.

  Isolation data   Identificationd  
Straina Sourceb Geographic location/year of isolation Phylogenetic Lineagec Species PCR/Api20E Pathovar/clade E Public Health Hazard
New isolates
VV3, VV4, VV5 Diseased tilapia Eastern Mediterranean /2016 ? +/+ (99.3%) -/- +
TI417 Diseased tilapia Eastern Mediterranean /2019 ? +/+ (99.3%) -/- +
Control strains
YJ016 Human blood Asia/1993 L1 +/+ (99.3%) -/- +
CECT 529T Human blood USA/1980 L2 +/+ (99.3%) -/- +
CECT 4999 Diseased eel Europe/1999 L2/clade E +/¿? (54.4%) +/+ +
CECT 5198 Diseased eel Europe/2000 L2/clade A +/+ (99.3%) +/- -
95-8-161 Diseased eel Europe/1995 L2/clade I +/+ (99.3%) +/- +
a

CECT, Spanish Type Culture Collection; T, type strain.

b

All the new isolates were recovered as pure cultures from internal organs of moribund tilapia. VV3 was isolated from farm A, VV4 and VV5 from farm B and TI417 from farm C.

c

Phylogenetic lineage determined by Roig et al [11]. L1 includes biotype 1 strains, L2 biotypes 1 and 2 strains and L3 biotype 3 strains. L2-Clade E includes all the zoonotic strains reported to date.

d

Identification of the isolates was performed at species, pathovar (piscis) and zoonotic clade (clade E) level by PCR targeting vvhA [20], fpcrp (formerly vep07) [21] and seq 61 [21], respectively. Positive (+), negative (-), and doubtful (¿?) identification. The value in parentheses indicates the probability of a good identification according to the API20E profile (5146105, probability 99.3%; 5006005, probability 54.4%).

e

The public health hazard of the strain was determined by PCR targeting a polymorphism of pilF [22]. Discrimination is based on the amplification of a variable region located within the gene pilF resulting in a 338 bp fragment.