Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 30;92(6):651–657. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1941629

Table 1.

Frequency of treatment modalities with demographic data and distribution of fracture types for the study cohort

Treatment modality a Number of fracturesn (%) Age
mean (range)
Female
%
Fracture type (AO/OTA b) n (%) c
A B C
Non-surgical 3,117 (77) 68 (16–104) 73 1,653 (53) 1,299 (42) 165 (5.3)
Surgical 953 (23) 65 (16–103) 68 347 (36) 307 (32) 299 (31)
 Plate 332 (8.2) 60 (16–99) 66 58 (17) 170 (51) 104 (31)
 IM nail 255 (6.3) 71 (19–103) 69 164 (64) 71 (28) 20 (7.8)
 Combination method 134 (3.3) 57 (20–102) 54 108 (81) 17 (13) 9 (6.7)
 HA 139 (3.4) 70 (35-92) 75 8 (5.8) 26 (19) 105 (76)
 RSA 93 (2.3) 75 (51–96) 85 9 (9.7) 23 (25) 61 (66)
All treatments 4,070 (100) 68 (16–104) 72 2,000 (49) 1,606 (39) 464 (11)

aIM nail, intramedullary nail; HA, hemiarthroplasty; RSA, reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

bAO/OTA, Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association fracture classification; A, fracture type A; B, fracture type B; C, fracture type C.

cPercentage within the treatment group.