Table 4.

Experimental results of RAHMFWFS based on accuracy, AUC, and F-measure.

Datasets	Accuracy value (%)		AUC value		F-measure value
	RAHMFWFS		RAHMFWFS		RAHMFWFS
	NB	DT	NB	DT	NB	DT
EQ	74.38	75.93	0.818	0.79	0.716	0.761
JDT	84.75	84.25	0.831	0.76	0.838	0.817
ML	85.12	87.11	0.735	0.689	0.842	0.835
PDE	83.23	86.77	0.755	0.655	0.832	0.823
CM1	84.4	85.32	0.744	0.544	0.823	0.807
KC1	76.07	86.16	0.888	0.644	0.718	0.725
KC2	84.67	84.1	0.818	0.78	0.83	0.818
KC3	79.9	83	0.886	0.85	0.769	0.803
MC2	72.8	74.4	0.704	0.777	0.731	0.707
MW1	89.6	91.2	0.782	0.615	0.869	0.89
PC1	91.46	91.9	0.792	0.659	0.907	0.898
PC3	87.5	87.56	0.806	0.884	0.934	0.934
PC4	89.9	88.89	0.845	0.87	0.858	0.874
PC5	74.34	75.34	0.694	0.673	0.691	0.882
SAFE	76.79	69.64	0.866	0.763	0.752	0.85
ZXING	74.16	73.92	0.832	0.561	0.809	0.8
APACHE	74.16	75.65	0.755	0.72	0.718	0.716
ECLIPSE	100	100	1	1	1	1
SWT	83.97	90.16	0.885	0.914	0.835	0.883
ANT	89.38	88.36	0.801	0.71	0.89	0.874
JEDIT	83.01	80.41	0.796	0.714	0.791	0.864
REDKITOR	90.34	89.77	0.774	0.686	0.883	0.885
TOMCAT	89.08	92.14	0.826	0.694	0.892	0.896
VELOCITY	87.24	86.22	0.789	0.741	0.858	0.853
XALAN	60.6	66.7	0.631	0.595	0.788	0.808
Average	82.67	83.80	0.802	0.732	0.823	0.840