Table 1.

Mean femoral and tibial torsion as determined by the Lee and ellipses methods.

	Method	Reader			p-values	Post-hoc test details
		R1	R2	Alg		Alg vs R1	Alg vs R2	R1 vs R2
Femoral torsion	Lee	16.1 (11.6; 20.6)	18.0 (13.2; 22.9)	15.8 (11.0; 20.6)	< 0.001	0.859	< 0.001	< 0.001
Tibial torsion	Ellipses	33.9 (30.8; 37.0)	34.3 (30.7; 37.9)	35.2 (31.7; 38.6)	0.311	0.212	0.622	0.877

Readers are radiologist 1 (R1), radiologist 2 (R2), and the algorithm (Alg). Means (95% confidence intervals) [°]. Statistical analysis was performed by repeated measures ANOVA followed by pair-wise Tukey's post-hoc test. Results of the other methods of determining femoral (according to the Reikeras, Tomczak, and Murphy methods) and tibial torsion (according to the bimalleolar and talus methods) are detailed in Supplementary Table 2. Adjusted p-values with significant differences indicated in bold type.