Table 4.
Step 1 | Step 2a | Step 3b | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | AIC | R2 | ΔR2 | AIC | R2 | ΔR2 | AIC | Unstandardized coefficientsc | |||
Female | Male | ||||||||||
Social cognitive composite | UPSA | 0.343** | −1075 | 0.345** | 0.002 | −1074 | 0.363** | 0.018* | −1079 | 0.05** | 0.093** |
MASC | 0.071** | −379 | 0.097** | 0.026* | −384 | 0.098** | 0.001 | −382 | |||
RFS | 0.079** | 1058 | 0.080** | 0.001 | 1057 | 0.081** | 0.001 | 1059 | |||
IRI total | UPSA | 0.000 | −971 | 0.013 | 0.013 | −972 | 0.013 | 0.000 | −970 | ||
MASC | 0.023** | −362 | 0.055** | 0.032** | −368 | 0.055** | 0.000 | −366 | |||
RFS | 0.002 | 1125 | 0.026 | 0.024** | 1118 | 0.026 | 0.000 | 1120 |
AIC Akaike Information Criterion, UPSA the University of California at San Diego Performance-based Assessment, MASC the Maryland Assessment of Social Competence, RFS the Role Functioning Scale, IRI the Interpersonal Reactivity Index.
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
aStep 2 included sex as a dummy variable.
bStep 3 included interaction between sex and predictors.
cFor significant interactions, unstandardized coefficients are presented. The significance of unstandardized coefficients was examined using t-tests.