Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 18;12:713713. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.713713

TABLE 1.

Estimated values comparing clinimetric parameters between colorimetric RT-LAMP and RT-qPCR on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 for molecular diagnosis of COVID-19.

RT-qPCR Colorimetric RT-LAMP
Metrics % (95% CI)
Ct value Positive Negative Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy PPV NPV
15–30 171 0 100 (98–100) 100 (94.5–100) 100 100 100
15–32 199 4 98 (95–99.5) 100 (94.5–100) 99.95 100 99.95 (99.8–100)
15–34 221 13 94 (90.7–97) 100 (94.5–100) 99.90 100 99.9 (99.7–100)
15–36 245 29 89 (85.1–93) 100 (94.5–100) 99.74 100 99.7 (99.6–99.8)
15–40 254 48 84 (79.4–88) 100 (94.5–100) 99.60 100 99.6 (99.5–99.7)
Negative 0 65

Sensitivity: probability that the test result will be positive when the disease is present (true positive rate) = true positive/(true positives + false negatives); Specificity: probability that a test result will be negative when the disease is not present (true-negative rate) = true negatives/(true negatives + false positives); accuracy, PPV, and NPV depending on COVID-19 disease prevalence that was considered here as 2.5% according to the average value of two surveys during May and June 2020 (Hallal et al., 2020). PPV is the probability that the disease is present when the test is positive, whereas NPV is the probability that the disease is not present when the test is negative, and both are calculated as follows: PPV = sensitivity × prevalence/sensitivity × prevalence + (1 – specificity) × (1 – prevalence); NPV = specificity × (1 – prevalence)/(1 – sensitivity) × prevalence + specificity × (1 – prevalence); accuracy is the overall probability that a patient is correctly classified and is calculated as follows: =sensitivity × prevalence + specificity × (1 – prevalence). All calculations were performed using MedCalc (https://www.medcalc.org/) and VassarStats—Clinical Research Calculators (http://vassarstats.net/).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure