Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 1;5(4):e10702. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10702

TABLE 1.

Demographic differences between randomized groups (N = 210)

PSD,

n = 102 (48.6%)

RCDP,

N = 108 (51.4%)

p‐value
Current role in ED
Categorical pediatric residents 34 (33.3) 34 (31.5) 0.86
EM resident 23 (22.5) 21 (19.4)
Other combined resident (Med‐Peds, Ped‐Neuro, etc.) 11 (10.8) 15 (13.9)
RN 34 (33.3) 38 (35.2)
Current year in training (for residents)
PGY‐1 6 (8.8) 4 (5.7) 0.67
PGY‐2 50 (73.5) 50 (71.4)
PGY‐3 11 (16.2) 13 (18.6)
PGY‐4 1 (1.5) 3 (4.3)
Estimate of real codes 5.0 (2.0–10.0) 3.0 (1.75–10.0) 0.28
Is PALS certificate up to date
No 3 (2.9) 7 (6.5) 0.33 a
Yes 99 (97.1) 101 (93.5)
Previous exposure to simulation training
No 5 (4.9) 4 (3.7) 0.74 a
Yes 97 (95.1) 104 (96.3)
Previous leader in simulated code
No 32 (31.4) 33 (30.6) 0.90
Yes 70 (68.6) 75 (69.4)
Teams with CPR coach PSD teams, n = 21 RCDP teams, n = 20
14 (66) 13 (65) 0.91

Data are reported as n (%) or median (IQR).

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; PALS, Pediatric Advanced Life Support; PSD, postsimulation debriefing; RCDP, rapid‐cycle deliberate practice.

a

Fisher's exact test was utilized when any cell value was less than 5.