Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 29;9:e12574. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12574

Table 2. Results of comparisons between each major group via pANCOVA, for the analysis of Σmmuscle v. mbody.

Anatomical region Test Mammals v. reptiles Mammals v. bipeds Reptiles v. bipeds
df F P F P df F P F P df F P F P
Forelimb Whole S 2.29 1.442 0.24 32.465 <0.001
I 2.29 1.639 0.211 33.14 <0.001
S + I 2.28 1.08 0.353 19.112 <0.001
Proximal S 2.30 1.008 0.324 25.295 <0.001
I 2.30 1.114 0.3 27.243 <0.001
S + I 2.29 0.73 0.491 14.967 <0.001
Distal S 2.31 0.481 0.493 24.355 <0.001
I 2.31 0.509 0.481 17.047 <0.001
S + I 2.30 0.377 0.689 11.945 <0.001
Hindlimb Whole S 2.42 1.673 0.203 14.715 <0.001 2.36 5.181 0.029 11.763 0.002 2.15 21.811 <0.001 41.475 <0.001
I 2.42 0.259 0.613 13.985 0.001 2.36 2.616 0.115 10.143 0.003 2.15 8.332 0.011 32.61 <0.001
S + I 2.41 0.855 0.433 9.291 0.001 2.35 2.519 0.095 6.554 0.004 2.14 13.11 0.001 36.147 <0.001
Proximal S 2.32 4.268 0.047 16.724 <0.001 2.26 3.688 0.066 6.595 0.016 2.15 7.192 0.017 10.129 0.006
I 2.32 0.787 0.382 9.695 0.004 2.26 2.362 0.136 5.666 0.025 2.15 3.064 0.101 8.641 0.01
S + I 2.31 2.112 0.138 8.643 0.001 2.25 1.831 0.181 3.564 0.044 2.14 3.521 0.058 5.825 0.014
Distal S 2.32 0.089 0.768 8.089 0.008 2.26 9.577 0.005 26.166 <0.001 2.15 10.088 0.006 15.239 0.001
I 2.32 0.199 0.659 15.57 <0.001 2.26 5.05 0.033 26.659 <0.001 2.15 6.737 0.02 31.079 <0.001
S + I 2.31 0.166 0.848 7.819 0.002 2.25 4.64 0.019 17.517 <0.001 2.14 6.955 0.008 17.242 <0.001

Note:

Each pairwise comparison was tested for differences in slope (S), intercept (I) and slope and intercept (S + I). Results for analyses without controlling for phylogeny are also presented (ANCOVA, †); significant results are in boldface; df = degrees of freedom.