Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 1;41(48):9891–9905. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1200-21.2021

Table 1.

Passive neuronal properties and kinetics for mEPSC experiments

Experimental condition Frequency (Hz) Rin (MΩ) Vm (mV) Rise time (ms) Decay τ (ms)
Figure 2 a
    NT 4.13 ± 0.45 151 ± 7 −74 ± 2 0.56 ± 0.02 2.97 ± 0.12
    IP: CNO 3.32 ± 0.47 172 ± 12 −77 ± 2 0.56 ± 0.01 2.72 ± 0.11
    IP: DR + CNO 4.59 ± 0.41 176 ± 10 −73 ± 2 0.56 ± 0.02 2.72 ± 0.09
    DW: CNO 4.13 ± 0.45 189 ± 7 −81 ± 1 0.53 ± 0.01 2.51 ± 0.07
    DW: DR + CNO 4.19 ± 0.46 188 ± 7 −79 ± 2 0.54 ± 0.01 2.42 ± 0.06
Figure 3 b
    CT+ 1.54 ± 0.18 184 ± 10 −79 ± 1 0.57 ± 0.02 3.26 ± 0.16
    CT 2.33 ± 0.24 202 ± 7 −82 ± 1 0.56 ± 0.01 2.79 ± 0.10
    GFP 1.99 ± 0.28 171 ± 8 −81 ± 1 0.59 ± 0.02 3.00 ± 0.11
Figure 5 c
    Shk3 KO: NT 4.09 ± 0.41 192 ± 9 −79 ± 2 0.53 ± 0.01 2.59 ± 0.08
    Shk3 KO: CNO 4.30 ± 0.37 206 ± 6 −83 ± 1 0.51 ± 0.01 2.51 ± 0.06
    Shk3 KO: DR + CNO 4.95 ± 0.47 209 ± 10 −82 ± 2 0.56 ± 0.01 2.60 ± 0.08
Figure 7 d
    NT 2.98 ± 0.25 146 ± 7 −80 ± 2 0.57 ± 0.01 3.09 ± 0.08
    24 h 3.37 ± 0.27 152 ± 8 −78 ± 2 0.59 ± 0.01 3.04 ± 0.07
    48 h 1.90 ± 0.10 157 ± 8 −83 ± 1 0.56 ± 0.02 2.80 ± 0.10

Rin, input resistance; Vm, resting membrane potential; IP, intraperitoneal injection; Shk3, Shank3.

aMultigroup comparison (NT; IP: CNO; IP: DR + CNO): frequency, p = 0.054; Rin, p = 0.2016; Vm, p = 0.4854; rise time, p = 0.8648; decay τ, p = 0.1773. Two-group comparison (DW: CNO; DW: DR + CNO): frequency, p = 0.2366; Rin, p = 0.9982; Vm, p = 0.5476; rise time, p = 0.4422; decay τ, p = 0.7535.

bMultigroup comparison (CT+, CT, GFP): frequency, p = 0.0510; Rin, p = 0.3211; Vm, p = 0.1993; rise time, p = 0.3189; decay τ, p = 0.2015.

cMultigroup comparison (Shk3 KO: NT; Shk3 KO: CNO; Shk3 KO: DR + CNO): frequency, p = 0.4776; Rin, p = 0.345; Vm, p = 0.1637; rise time, p = 0.1724; decay τ, p = 0.8728.

dMultigroup comparison (NT, 24 h, 48 h): frequency, p = 0.053; Rin, p = 0.1849; Vm, p = 0.1780; rise time, p = 0.0615; decay τ, p = 0.057.