Table III.
Participants’ results for the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) motor and process scales as whole group and by 3 learning ability subgroups with reference values
| Total Group, n = 35 | Group ID-F, n = 9 | Group NID-F, n = 11 | Group NID-C, n = 15 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference Values (SD) (30) | Mean (SD) 95% CI [Comparison with reference value] | Mean (SDa) 95% CI [Comparison with reference value] | Mean (SDa) 95% CI [Comparison with reference value] | Mean (SDa) 95% CI [Comparison with reference value] | |
| AMPS motorb | 2.88 (0.51) | 0.8 (05) 0.6–1.0 [Below 3 SD] | 0.4 (0.5) 0.02–0.8 [Below 3 SD] | 0.7 (0.5) 0.04–1.0 [Below 3 SD] | 1.1 (0.3) 1.0–1.2 [Below 2 SD] |
| AMPS processc | 1.2 (0.46) | 0.5 (0.5) 0.3–0.6 [Borderline] | 0.2 (0.4) –0.1–0.5 [Below 2 SD] | 0.3 (0.4) 0.1–0.6 [Borderline] | 0.8 (0.4) 0.6–1.0 [Within reference values] |
a
Related to group mean value. All results in this table were normally distributed according to Shapiro–Wilk.
b
Significant differences ID-F to NID-C.
c
Significant differences ID-F to NID-F and NID-C.
Group ID-F: Intellectual disability, failed to successfully pass compulsory education; Group NID-F: No intellectual disability, failed to successfully pass compulsory education; Group NID-C: No intellectual disability, completed compulsory education.