Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 2.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2021 Aug 27;66(17):10.1088/1361-6560/ac176d. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac176d

Table 1.

Quantitative comparison between the segmentation results of the proposed SDL-Seg and basic U-Net for the five test cases and the average across cases. Values represent mean ± standard deviation.

Metrics Methods Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Mean

DSC (%) U-Net 70.8±2.1% 57.8%±21.1% 63.2%±4.3%, 51.9%±9.5% 69.2±3.7% 62.6±7.8
SDL-Seg 74.3%±4.8% 79.35±3.7% 75.6±1.7% 73.6%±4.4% 79.3%±1.5% 76.4±2.7

HD95 (mm) U-Net 5.12±1.19 13.02±12.01 7.77±1.5 7.4±1.84 8.86±2.12 8.39±2.9
SDL-Seg 4.8±1.07 7.7±10.37 9.196±1.02 5.12±1.48 6.93±2.43 6.76±1.83

ASD (mm) U-Net 2.34±0.26 2.73±1.43 3.13±0.38 3.94±0.87 1.92±0.29 2.8±0.77
SDL-Seg 1.88±0.37 1.27±0.1 2.89±0.21 2.12±0.56 1.34±0.19 1.9±0.66