Table 4.
Threshold effect analysis of the correlation between EMWHOLE, EMHARDEST and mVSS in 69 pathological scars.
| mVSS | |
|---|---|
| EMWHOLE* | |
| EMWHOLE ≤ 166.6 | 0.020 (0.004, 0.036), P = 0.019 |
| EMWHOLE > 166.6 | −0.004 (−0.023, 0.015), P = 0.677 |
| EMHARDEST# | |
| EMHARDEST ≤ 133.07 | 0.031 (0.012, 0.050), P = 0.002 |
| EMHARDEST > 133.07 | 0.003 (−0.004, 0.010), P = 0.382 |
*Adjusted variables: age; duration; etiology; treatment; scar location; scar length; scar width; echogenicity; subclinical fistulous tracts; supracutaneous height; intradermal height; blood flow type; blood flow distribution pattern; scar type.
#Adjusted variables: age; duration; etiology; scar location; scar length; scar width; echogenicity; subclinical fistulous tracts; supracutaneous height; blood flow type; scar type.