Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 14;12(4):517–521. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2021.07.005

Table 2.

Results from logistic regression analysis of infertility in accordance with long working hours and age group

Subgroup Odds ratio (95% confidence interval), referred to the group of non-long working hours
Crude model Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Overall (n = 5,909) 1.30 (0.95–1.74) 1.27 (0.93–1.71) 1.28 (0.93–1.72) 1.18 (0.85–1.61)
Subgroup for age group
<40 y (n = 2,620) 1.96 (1.22–3.04) 1.97 (1.22–3.06) 1.97 (1.22–3.07) 1.91 (1.17–3.01)
≥40 y (n = 3,289) 0.99 (0.65–1.47) 0.99 (0.64–1.46) 0.99 (0.64–1.47) 0.87 (0.55–1.31)
Subgroup for contraceptive experience
Yes (n = 487) 3.19 (1.37–8.71) 3.15 (1.23–9.22) 3.27 (1.27–9.58) 2.94 (1.12–8.76)
No (n = 5,422) 1.09 (0.71–1.61) 1.07 (0.69–1.58) 1.07 (0.70–1.58) 0.97 (0.62–1.47)
Subgroup for abortion experience
Yes (n = 1,791) 0.77 (0.43–1.30) 0.81 (0.45–1.36) 0.81 (0.45–1.37) 0.68 (0.37–1.19)
No (n = 4,118) 1.67 (1.15–2.37) 1.62 (1.11–2.29) 1.62 (1.11–2.30) 1.55 (1.05–2.24)

Model 1: adjusting for age.

Model 2: Model 1 + adjusting for education and average monthly household income.

Model 3: Model 2 + adjusting for occupational classification and employment type.