Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 7;105(6):1536–1543. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0253

Table 2.

Study 1: Linear mixed model

Contrast Time Estimate SE df Lower CL Upper CL T ratio P value
Booklet—control T1 0.080 0.674 239.421 −1.664 1.825 0.119 0.999
Tutoring—control T1 0.687 0.730 254.426 −1.202 2.576 0.941 0.783
Tutoring—booklet T1 0.607 0.712 258.937 −1.234 2.448 0.852 0.829
Tutoring with booklet—control T1 1.220 0.754 238.114 −0.730 3.171 1.619 0.370
Tutoring with booklet—booklet T1 1.140 0.751 240.593 −0.803 3.083 1.518 0.428
Tutoring with booklet—tutoring T1 0.533 0.799 250.776 −1.533 2.600 0.667 0.909
Booklet—control T2 1.370 0.718 269.655 −0.487 3.226 1.907 0.227
Tutoring—control T2 0.969 0.753 267.149 −0.977 2.915 1.287 0.572
Tutoring—booklet T2 −0.401 0.689 241.569 −2.184 1.382 −0.582 0.938
Tutoring with booklet—control T2 2.199 0.788 259.706 0.160 4.238 2.789 0.029
Tutoring with booklet—booklet T2 0.829 0.748 238.415 −1.106 2.764 1.108 0.685
Tutoring with booklet—tutoring T2 1.230 0.780 237.897 −0.789 3.249 1.576 0.394
Booklet—control T3 0.669 0.753 291.335 −1.277 2.614 0.888 0.811
Tutoring—control T3 0.855 0.783 285.602 −1.170 2.879 1.091 0.695
Tutoring—booklet T3 0.186 0.710 258.754 −1.651 2.023 0.262 0.994
Tutoring with booklet—control T3 2.526 0.900 313.917 0.201 4.851 2.806 0.027
Tutoring with booklet—booklet T3 1.857 0.847 298.093 −0.330 4.045 2.194 0.127
Tutoring with booklet—tutoring T3 1.672 0.879 295.129 −0.598 3.942 1.903 0.229

Comparisons between groups (expected values). df = degrees of freedom; SE = standard error. Significant differences (P value < 0.05, in bold) were found only between groups C and TB, and in timesT2 and T3. Estimates indicate the number of correct responses to which those differences are equivalent (e.g., in T3, TB group has 2.526 more correct responses than C group).