Table 2.
Intercorrelations of the Used Scales for Both Samples
| Scale | Sample | IG-a | IG-p | SC-bo | SC-br |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IG-a | 1 | – | |||
| 2 | – | ||||
| IG-p | 1 | .531*** | – | ||
| 2 | .462a*** | – | |||
| SC-bo | 1 | .220** | .317*** | – | |
| 2 | .156** | .224a*** | – | ||
| SC-br | 1 | .434*** | .480*** | .403*** | – |
| 2 | .429*** | .427a*** | 283*** | – | |
| SWLS | 1 | −.125 | .102 | .295*** | .072 |
| 2 | −.060 | .063a | .132* | .074 |
dfs1 = 141, dfs2 = 318, a = rank correlation according to Spearman; 1 = Sample 1, 2 = Sample 2; IG-a = Instagram active, IG-p = Instagram passive, SC-bo = Social Capital bonding, SC-br = Social Capital bridging, SWLS = Satisfaction with Life Scale. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001