. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Methods. 2021 Apr 6;53(6):2302–2325. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01573-x

Table 4:

Drift rate parameters for the four tasks from Experiments 1 and 2

Task (and subject group)	v₁	v₂	v₃	v₄	v₅	v₆
Lexical decision	0.417	0.224	0.119	−0.270
Item recognition	0.175	0.296	0.064	0.149	−0.186	−0.281
Lex dec (RTM 2010, college)	0.457	0.227	0.127	−0.240
Lex dec (RTM 2010, 60–74)	0.412	0.238	0.141	−0.253
Lex dec (RTM 2010, 75–90)	0.437	0.280	0.169	−0.249
Item recog (RTM 2010, college)	0.159	0.334	0.052	0.168	−0.266	−0.328
Item recog (RTM 2010, 60–74)	0.196	0.297	0.040	0.138	−0.291	−0.352
Item recog (RTM 2010, 75–90)	0.192	0.271	0.044	0.113	−0.249	−0.317
BY (“good”)	0.0304	0.0141
Y25 (“good”)	0.0375	0.0379
BY (“bad”)	0.0222	0.0100
Y25 (“bad”)	0.0340	0.0337
BY (R&M 2018)	0.037	0.016
Y25 (R&M 2018)	0.031	0.032