Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 2.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cell. 2021 Sep 29:S1097-2765(21)00746-2. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.09.012

Figure 3. In Vivo in Flies, 2′-O-methylation Protects piRNAs against Destabilization by Complementary Sites.

Figure 3.

Left, the predicted fraction of fly piRNAs bound to complementary sites in transcripts for different regions of the piRNA; a representative experiment from fly ovaries is shown. Right, the difference in the predicted median fraction bound for stable (≥ 80% of w1118 levels in hen1f00810) and unstable (≤ 20% of w1118 levels in hen1f00810) unmethylated piRNAs for contiguous complementarity starting at different piRNA nucleotides; data are for all possible permutations of biological replicates of fly ovaries (w1118, n = 4; hen1f00810, n = 2). Grey: data for piRNA regions for which the predicted median fraction bound did not decrease monotonically in the direction from unstable to stable piRNAs. The 95% confidence interval for the effect size of median difference was calculated with 10,000 bootstrapping iterations.