. 2021 Dec 3;11:23395. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02908-6

Table 3.

Results from Kruskal–Wallis significance tests for tractography metrics.

		Node (network represented by node)
		Precuneus (DMN)	Right superior temporal lobe (AN)	Left superior temporal lobe (AN)
Mean strength	Result from Kruskal–Wallis test; effect size	p(χ²) = 0.0289; η² = 0.0648	p(χ²) = 0.0175; η² = 0.0767	p(χ²) = 0.0727; η² = 0.0428
Mean strength	Significant post-hoc contrasts	CON_NH > TIN_HL*	CON_NH > TIN_HL*	N/A
Local efficiency	Result from Kruskal–Wallis test; effect size	p(χ²) = 0.00754; η² = 0.0963	p(χ²) = 0.0567; η² = 0.0488	p(χ²) = 0.0282; η² = 0.0654
Local efficiency	Significant post-hoc contrasts	CON_NH > TIN_HL*	N/A	CON_NH > TIN_HL*
Clustering coefficient	Result from Kruskal–Wallis test; effect size	p(χ²) = 0.00827; η² = 0.0942	p(χ²) = 0.0361; η² = 0.0596	p(χ²) = 0.0207; η² = 0.0727
Clustering coefficient	Significant post-hoc contrasts	CON_NH > TIN_HL*	N/A	CON_NH > TIN_HL*

Post-hoc Dunn’s tests were conducted on significant contrasts, with Bonferroni correction. Effect sizes were calculated as η2 based on the H-estimate⁶⁶. DMN default mode network, AN auditory network. *p < 0.05.