Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 6;49(21):e126. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab815

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

SMETANA simulations uncover differences in metabolism across conditions. (A) Alluvial diagram showing top 10 compounds exchanged with statistical significance across conditions between eight species, representing 279 interactions (NGT n = 61, IGT n = 58, T2D n = 160) across 41 samples (NGT n = 12, IGT n = 12, T2D n = 17). Thickness of lines are proportional to magnitude of SMETANA score. (B) Radar plot of average SMETANA scores based on 543 interactions (NGT n = 50, IGT n = 161, T2D n = 249) across 18 samples (NGT n = 4, IGT n = 6, T2D n = 8) grouped by metabolite class across conditions for receiver Faecalibacterium prausnitzii C. (C) Network diagrams of interactions involving Faecalibacterium prausnitzii C (centered in each subgraph) as a receiver across conditions. Thickness of lines are proportional to magnitude of SMETANA score.