Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 22;12:786752. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.786752

TABLE 1.

Methodological quality of the included studies.

Study 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Total (0–10)
Counts et al. (2015) + + + + + + 6
Loenneke et al. (2015) + + + + + + 6
Loenneke et al. (2016) + + + + + + + 7
Fatela et al. (2016) + + + + + + 6
Jessee et al. (2017) + + + + + + 6
Dankel et al. (2017) + + + + + + 6
Buckner et al. (2018) + + + + + + 6
Jessee et al. (2019) + NR + + + + 5
Ilett et al. (2019) + + + + + + 6
Singer et al. (2020) + + + + + 5

1 – Eligibility criteria specified; 2 – Random allocation; 3 – Concealed allocation; 4 – Groups similar at Baseline; 5 – Participant blinding; 6 – Therapist blinding; 7 – Assessor blinding; 8 – Adequate follow-up; 9 – Intention to-treat analysis; 10 - Between group comparisons; 11 – Point estimates and variability; NR: not reported.