Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 26;31(3):717–733. doi: 10.1111/jora.12666

Table 3.

Linear Mixed‐Effects Models Predicting Loneliness

Models (DV: Loneliness) AIC

Log likelihood

(p‐value)

Demographics Loneliness ˜ session + gender + age + (1|ID) 1714 −850.995
Demographics and controls Loneliness ˜ session + age + screen time + family social support + friend social support + (1|ID) 1382

−681.99

(p < .001)

Online social experiences Loneliness ˜ session + online experiences + gender + age + screen time + family social support + friend social support + (1|ID) 1257.8

617.88

( p < .001***)

Full interaction Loneliness ˜ session + positive online × negative online + age + gender + screen time + family social support + friend social support + (1|ID) 1259.0

−617.52

(p = .40)

Interactions between online social experiences and session Loneliness ˜ session × positive online experiences + negative online experiences + gender + age + screen time + family social support + friend social support + (1|ID) 1259.5

−614.76

(p = .14)

Four‐way interaction with gender Loneliness ˜ session × positive online experiences × negative online experiences × gender + age + screen time + family social support + friend social support + (1|ID) 1271.5

−613.78

(p = .96)

Four‐way interaction with age Loneliness ˜ session × positive online experiences × negative online experiences × age + gender + screen time + family social support + friend social support + (1|ID) 1266.8

−611.37

(p < .001***)

Preferred model (in bold) was selected based on AIC values by sequentially comparing nested models. Models with interaction effects also included a main effect for these factors.

AIC = Akaike information criterion.

*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.