Table 1 |.
Comparison of CODEX tissue imaging for FFPE and FF specimens
| FFPE | FF | |
|---|---|---|
| Antibodies | ||
| Availability | Many clones are not available in purified and carrier-free format | Most flow cytometry antibodies work well |
| Utilization | Requires optimization of epitope retrieval conditions (i.e., difficult to assemble a panel of ≥50 antibodies that all stain well under the same conditions) | Little protocol optimization required |
| Cost | Expensive | Reasonable |
| Tissue specimen | ||
| Availability | Widely available (most common type of clinical specimen) | Limited availability |
| Handling | Easy to handle and store | Difficult to handle and store |
| Infectious risk | Low to none | Potentially infectious |
| Morphology | Well-preserved morphology over the course of a multicycle | Deteriorates over the course of many cycles in a multicycle |
| Applications | Retrospective clinical cohorts, with full clinical annotations; biomarker discovery of cancer or vaccine clinical trials; compatible with large-scale tissue microarrays (e.g., ≤128 samples); enabling all samples/conditions to be stained and imaged in a single multicycle | Requires prospective collection; not compatible with large-scale tissue microarrays; resulting in batch effects over numerous multicycles |