Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Protoc. 2021 Jul 2;16(8):3802–3835. doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00556-8

Table 1 |.

Comparison of CODEX tissue imaging for FFPE and FF specimens

FFPE FF
Antibodies
 Availability Many clones are not available in purified and carrier-free format Most flow cytometry antibodies work well
 Utilization Requires optimization of epitope retrieval conditions (i.e., difficult to assemble a panel of ≥50 antibodies that all stain well under the same conditions) Little protocol optimization required
 Cost Expensive Reasonable
Tissue specimen
 Availability Widely available (most common type of clinical specimen) Limited availability
 Handling Easy to handle and store Difficult to handle and store
 Infectious risk Low to none Potentially infectious
 Morphology Well-preserved morphology over the course of a multicycle Deteriorates over the course of many cycles in a multicycle
 Applications Retrospective clinical cohorts, with full clinical annotations; biomarker discovery of cancer or vaccine clinical trials; compatible with large-scale tissue microarrays (e.g., ≤128 samples); enabling all samples/conditions to be stained and imaged in a single multicycle Requires prospective collection; not compatible with large-scale tissue microarrays; resulting in batch effects over numerous multicycles