Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 22;2016(1):CD004288. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004288.pub3
Study Reason for exclusion
Adjoussou 2009 Not a randomised controlled trial
Aly 1983 A laboratory‐based study
Aly 1988 A laboratory‐based study
Aly 1998 Evaluated patient skin preparations
Arata 1993 Evaluated patient skin preparations
Ayliffe 1984 A discussion paper
Ayliffe 1988 A laboratory and ward study ‐ not hand antisepsis
Ayliffe 1990 Hand hygiene study
Babb 1991 Study carried out on volunteers, not scrub staff in an operating theatre
Bansal 2002 Wound irrigation study
Barsanti 2009 Infection in ITU
Bartzokas 1983 A laboratory‐based study
Bearman 2010 Gloving study
Beeuwkes 1986 Participants were not randomised
Bendig 1990 A laboratory‐based study
Bernam 2004 Not a randomised controlled trial
Bibbo 2005 Evaluated patient skin preparations
Blomgren 1983 Body exhaust suit study
Borer 2001 Infection surveillance study
Boyce 2000a An editorial
Boyce 2000b Evaluated skin condition rather than SSIs or CFUs
Braumann 2008 Study of dressings
Breeze 1994 Discussion paper
Brooks 2001 Evaluated patient skin preparations
Bruckner 2009 Study of dressings
Bryce 2001 Not a randomised controlled trial. Participants used product A for 2 weeks then swapped to product B for the following 2 weeks.
Caelli 2000 Study of MRSA decolonisation
Carro 2007 Not a randomised controlled trial
Cheng 2001 Literature review
Coelho 1984 Not relevant to this review
Cremieux 1989 A laboratory‐based study
Crowder 1967 Study was not randomised. Participants performed antisepsis using their usual solution. There were no comparison groups
Culligan 2005 Randomised controlled trial comparing antiseptic solutions on patients' skin
Curti 1974 Chemical agents
Da Cunha 2011 Not a randomised controlled trial
Dahl 1990 Chlorhexidine scrub which was left on the surgeons arm was compared with a surgeons arm where the chlorhexidine scrub was rinsed off. Did not meet the objectives of this review
Das 2005 Study on hygienic hand washing
De Castro Peraza 2010 Study of gloves in surgery
Demir 2009 Staff survey
Deshmukh 1998 Participants were randomised to 2 groups. Group 1 participants were tested after 1 hour and group 2 participants were tested after 2 hours. Participants in both groups used product A 1 day and product B the next day
Dineen 1969 Participants' hands were covered with bacterial inoculum. A laboratory‐based study
Dineen 1978 A laboratory‐based study
Dohmen 2006 Antibiotic prophylaxic study
Durani 2008 Non‐systematic literature review
Elenbaas 1982 Dog bite study
Ellenhorn 2005 Evaluated patient skin preparations
Faoagali 1995 A laboratory style study using non clinical hospital staff
Ford 2005 Antimicrobial suture study
Grabsch 2004 Not randomised
Grinbaum 1995 A retrospective study
Gruendemann 2001 Discussion paper
Guilhermetti 2001 MRSA decontamination study
Hagen 1995 Evaluated patient skin preparations
Harnoss Study carried out on volunteers, not scrub staff in an operating theatre
Heeg 1986 Experimental and clinical conditions
Heeg 2001 Measured the impact of hand care products on alcohol rubs
Heeg 2008 Testing methods not suitable; not randomised
Hibbard 2002a A laboratory‐based study
Hibbard 2002b A laboratory‐based study
Hingst 1992 A laboratory‐based study
Hobson 1998 A laboratory‐based study
Hubner 2006 A laboratory‐based study
Incoll 2009 Skin preparation of patient
Jeng 1998 A laboratory‐based study
Jeng 2001 A study of skin antiseptics used on patients skin
Jones 2000 A laboratory‐based study and participants were not randomised
Joress 1962 No comparison group was used in the first part of the trial. Comparison groups were used in the second part of the trial, but solutions were applied to the forearm rather than as surgical scrubs
Kampf 2005 A laboratory‐based study
Kargi 2008 Anaesthetic agents study
Keser 2005 Not a randomised controlled trial
Kikuchi 1999 Measured condition of skin on hands of participants; did not compare CFUs or SSIs
Kjellander 1960 Not randomised
Kong 1994 Not relevant topic.
Kramer 2007 Not randomised
Kramer 2008 Descriptive paper of scrubbing methods
Larson 1984 Study focused on handwashing rather than hand antisepsis
Larson 1986a A laboratory‐based study
Larson 1986b A laboratory‐based study
Larson 1990 A laboratory‐based study
Larson 1993 A laboratory‐based study
Larson 2001a Study of handwashing in intensive care
Larson 2001b Not randomised to appropriate groups. 5 participants were randomised to a reference group at the beginning of the study. The participants randomised to the intervention group used an alcohol rub for 3 weeks and then a surgical scrub for 3 weeks
Lehmann 1985 Analgesics study
Lepor 2009 Patient skin prep study
Lilly 1978 A laboratory‐based study
Lio 2009 Study on topical agents
Llanos 2006 Wound management
Loeb 1997 Study carried out on volunteers, not scrub staff in an operating theatre
Lowbury 1974a Not relevant to this review
Lowbury 1974b A laboratory‐based study
Lung 2004 A literature review
Magann 1993 Evaluated patient skin preparations
Magera 2007 Patient skin preparation study
Marchetti 2003 Laboratory‐based study
Marra 2008 Hand hygiene study
Mathias 2000 A discussion paper
Mathias 2002 A discussion paper
McBride 1973 A laboratory‐based study
Meers 1978 Not relevant topic
Minakuchi 1993 A study of handwashing rather than hand antisepsis.
Misterka 1991 Study of dressings
Moralejo 2003 Not a randomised controlled trial; summary of previously published studies
Mulberry 2001 A laboratory‐based study
Murie 1980 Cross‐over trial but without any randomisation
Nakano 2008 Wound irrigation study
Nowak 1982 Bowel prep study
O'Shaughnessy 1991 All participants carried out intervention 1 on day 1, intervention 2 on day 2 and intervention 3 on day 3.
No randomisation
Olson 2012 Study carried out on volunteers, not scrub staff in an operating theatre
Ortiz 2012 Assessed intra‐operative rescrubbing
Parienti 2004 Central venous catheter study
Paulson 1994 A laboratory‐based study
Paulson 1999 A laboratory‐based study
Peterson 1978 A laboratory‐based study
Phimolsarnti 1986 Not randomised
Poon 1998 Not randomised
Rehork 1991 Study carried out on volunteers, not scrub staff in an operating theatre
Reid 1991 Study of wound management
Reverdy 1984 A laboratory‐based study
Rotter 1980 A laboratory‐based study
Rotter 1984 Study of handwashing rather than hand antisepsis
Rotter 1986 A laboratory‐based study
Rotter 1998 A laboratory‐based study
Rotter 2005 Explores hand hygiene rather than hand antisepsis
Rotter 2006 Laboratory‐based study
Sattar 2000 A laboratory‐based study
Scheibel 1991 Study of clean air systems
Scott 1991 Evaluated user satisfaction
Sensoz 2003 No evidence that the study was randomised
Serra 2005 Study of dressings
Shirahatti 1993 Evaluated patient skin preparations
Simor 2007 MRSA decolonisation
Springer 2002 Discussion paper
Stahl 2007 Lab based study of effect of saline in antimicrobial skin preparations
Starr 2005 Evaluated patient skin preparations
Stevenson 2003 Study of antibiotics
Sullivan 2008 Patient skin preparation study
Tanner 2008 Earlier systematic review
Thiele 2008 Literature review
Tucci 1977 Not a randomised controlled trial; no control group
Valente 2003 Wound irrigation study
Vogt 2006 Evaluated iodine based wound dressings
Voss 1997 Looked at compliance with various handwashing methods
Vossinakis 2004 Study of local anaesthetic
Walwaikar 2002 Each intervention group contained a scrub solution, a patient prep solution and a follow‐up wound cleansing product. It was not possible to look at the effect of the scrub solution on its own
Waterman 2006 Study of glove juice and rings
Webster 1989 Study of handwashing in a neo‐natal unit
Wernze 1975 Anaesthetics study
Whittaker 2005 Study of antibiotics in hand injuries
Yeung 2007 Hand hygiene literature review
Yuldashkhan 2008 Not a randomised controlled trial
Zaragoza 1999 A study of handwashing, not hand antisepsis.

MRSA: methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus