Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 29;2021:5034269. doi: 10.1155/2021/5034269

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Comparison of MPR values between the two groups of patients before and after intervention (x¯±s). Note. The abscissa represents before intervention and after intervention, and the ordinate represents MPR value (%). The MPR values of the research group were (73.29 ± 8.45)% and (86.25 ± 8.03)%, respectively, before and after intervention. The MPR values of the reference group were (73.32 ± 8.42)% and (77.43 ± 8.06)%, respectively, before and after intervention. indicates that there was a significant difference in MPR values in the research group before and after intervention (t = 7.862, P=0.000); ∗∗ indicates that there was a significant difference in MPR values in the reference group before and after intervention (t = 2.493, P=0.014); and ∗∗∗ indicates that there was a significant difference in MPR values between the two groups after intervention (t = 5.482, P=0.000).