Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 11;28(5):1875–1886. doi: 10.1007/s12350-019-01940-4

Table 2.

The SUVmax, cSUVmax and TBRmax of the aneurysm (AAA) for all the reconstruction algorithms

Mean ± SD P value
AAA AAAexc
SUVmax
 OSEM 3.32 ± 1.05 2.75 ± 0.84 .00038
 OSEM + PSF 3.62 ± 1.30 2.73 ± 0.79 < .0001
 OSEM + PSF + BC 2.85 ± 0.89 2.73 ± 0.81 .40
cSUVmax
 OSEM 2.61 ± 0.97 2.03 ± 0.75 .0001
 OSEM + PSF 2.75 ± 1.19 1.86 ± 0.68 < .0001
 OSEM + PSF + BC 2.05 ± 0.77 1.93 ± 0.70 .34
TBRmax
 OSEM 4.93 ± 1.73 4.08 ± 1.44 .0018
 OSEM + PSF 4.36 ± 1.52 3.30 ± 1.02 < 0.0001
 OSEM + PSF + BC 3.77 ± 1.25 3.63 ± 1.22 0.48

The SUVs of AAA were extracted using two ROIs (AAA and AAAexc) in order to quantify the spill in effect from the bone. The differences between AAA and AAAexc were compared using a paired t test. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). A P value less than .05 was considered statistically significant