Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 18;2(1):sgab021. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgab021

Table 2.

Screening Properties of the PQ-16, Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) Diagnosis of UHR or Psychotic Threshold vs No CAARMS Diagnosis, Using Method A

PQ-16 Cutoff Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV True Positives True Negatives False Positives False Negatives
Total group, n = 325
5 0.97 0.18 46.2 89.7 132 35 154 4
6 0.93 0.25 47.1 82.5 126 47 142 10
7 0.85 0.42 51.3 79.8 116 79 110 20
8 0.77 0.55 55.3 77.0 105 104 85 31
9 0.65 0.69 60.5 73.6 89 131 58 47
10 0.51 0.81 65.7 69.5 69 153 36 67
Girls, n = 217
5 0.98 016 50.8 90.0 100 18 97 2
6 0.92 0.23 51.4 76.5 94 26 89 8
7 0.87 0.38 55.6 77.2 89 44 71 13
8 0.78 0.55 60.3 73.3 79 63 52 23
9 0.70 070 67.0 72.1 71 80 35 31
10 0.55 0.83 73.7 67.4 56 95 20 46
Boys, n = 108
5 0.94 0.23 36.0 89.5 32 17 57 2
6 0.94 0.28 37.7 91.3 32 21 53 2
7 0.79 0.47 40.9 83.3 27 35 39 7
8 0.77 0.55 44.1 83.7 26 41 33 8
9 0.53 0.69 43.9 76.1 18 51 23 16
10 0.38 0.78 44.8 73.4 13 58 16 21

Note: Bold values represent the selected cutoff. NPV, negative predictive values; PPV, positive predictive values; PQ-16, Prodromal Questionnaire 16-item version; UHR, ultra-high risk.