Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 7;16:709. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02857-w

Table 2.

Comparisons of thoracolumbar QCT and Cobb’s angle between Groups (n = 312)

Variables Study group (n = 102) Control group (n = 210) p
QCT (mg/cm3)
 L1 64.20 ± 23.56 82.15 ± 24.86 0.000*

 L2

BMD (mg/cm3)

TLHCobb’s

TLCobb’s

DCTL

65.16 ± 25.44

70.18 ± 23.99

19.95 ± 4.53

12.74 ± 6.24

7.21 ± 2.10

85.16 ± 25.57

91.95 ± 25.06

18.96 ± 4.91

11.32 ± 6.45

7.64 ± 2.16

0.000*

0.000*

0.108

0.101

0.237

*p < 0.001, BMD was the mean of QCT-L1 and QCT-L2, DCTL was TLHCobb’s minus TLCobb’s

QCT; quantitative computed tomography, BMD; bone mineral density, TLHCobb’s; thoracolumbar hyperflexion Cobb’s angle, TLCobb’s; thoracolumbar Cobb’s angle, DCTL; the difference of Cobb’s angle of TLHCobb’s and TLCobb’s