Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 23;12:727300. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.727300

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Cytokine production by stimulated CD33+ myeloid cells. (A) The number of cytokine positive CD33+ myeloid cells per 1000 total CD45+ cells for each stimulation at 24 h with the background (unstimulated) cytokine-production removed. (B) Cluster analysis of IL-2 secreting cells with cluster 3, 4, 7 and 13 corresponding to myeloid cells. (C) Clusters significantly affected by stimulation (left) with cluster histograms indicating co-secretion of IL-6. (D) Cluster analysis of IL-4 secreting with cluster 3, 7, and 11 corresponding to myeloid cells. (E) Clusters significantly affected by stimulation (left) and co-expression with IL-6 and IL-10 (right). (F) Comparison of PIM stimulation on donors with active TB (ATB), latent TB (LTB) and healthy controls (HC) in cluster 11. (G) Myeloid clusters secreting IL-6 (H) significantly affected by stimulation. (I) Cell surface phenotype of indicated cluster. (J) Differential effect of PIM stimulation on cluster 7 cells in ATB, LTB, and HC. (K) Myeloid clusters secreting IL-10 with (L) clusters significantly affected by stimulation (left panel) and histograms indicating IL-10 co-expression with IL-6. (M) Myeloid clusters secreting TNF-ɑ (N) significantly affected by stimulation (left) with co-expression of GM-CSF and IL-6 (right). (O) Myeloid clusters secreting GM-CSF. (P) Clusters differently affected by stimulation (left) with co-expression of TNF-α and IL-6 (right). Statistical differences between stimulations in (A) were evaluated by Friedman’s test with Dunnet’s posttest, while comparisons within multiple clusters (C, E, H, L, N, P) were evaluated by a matched-pair two-way ANOVA with Geissner-Greenhouse correction followed by Tukey’s posttest (n=15/stimulation). Groups (ATB/LTB/HC) (F, J) were compared using Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s posttest (n=5/group) *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.